Conservative First

December 29, 2008

My Take on Twitter after a Month

I joined Twitter on December 1.  As I wrote the next day, I was aware of a number of my professional colleagues (in higher education) who were using Twitter.  I didn’t see the point, but I decided to give it a try.

Right now I’m following 36 people/groups, I have 59 followers, and I’ve posted 132 updates.

Some people I follow are on the Top Conservatives on Twitter list.  People on the list are ranked by the number of followers they have.  The first-ranked person on the list currently has 7,355 followers and is following 6,510, and none of the tweets on his page right this minute have anything to do with conservative politics.

The stated purpose of the TCOT list is “to build the conservative community on Twitter.”

Why?

What will this “community” do?  How can more than 7000 individuals and organizations be a community anyway?  How can the top-ranked conservative possibly read updates by 6510 people?  (I can’t keep up with all the updates of the 36 that I’m following.)  How will increasing the number of followers of conservatives on Twitter aid the conservative movement?

Barack Obama has 156,095 followers on Twitter, but what did that accomplish?  Did his presence on Twitter actually convince anyone to vote for him, or was it just a morale builder for liberals?

There may be a point to following conservative candidates and leaders (like Michelle Malkin) on Twitter to demonstrate our support for them and find out what they are doing and thinking.  However, that doesn’t explain why I should “follow” anyone else who calls him- or herself a conservative–especially if he or she is posting about other uninteresting (i.e., personal) topics.

To be honest, I still don’t see the point of Twitter, or other microblogging services, and I think their potential in education and political activism is limited.  There are other tools that will probably work better–once we decide what exactly we are trying to accomplish in the conservative movement with web 2.0 (including “social media”) applications and other technology like virtual worlds.

I suspect, though I have no proof, that this emphasis on social media by a segment of the conservative movement is being lead by marketing types.  If conservatives want to learn how to use technology effectively to advance our candidates and causes, we should look to people in instructional technology and technical communication–not in marketing and advertising.

We need to focus on teaching Americans about the Constitution, the history of the country, capitalism, conservatism, etc., rather than trying to be the most popular conservative on Twitter or Facebook.

Yes, I will continue to update my Twitter account, and I hope my followers will find my posts informative and/or thought provoking.

Advertisements

5 Comments

  1. I think you make some interesting points about Twitter and it’s use for certain groups. I think one of the great things about “micro-blogging” on Twitter is the sharing of information (i.e. links), not necessarily how many followers you have.

    Political candidates should use Twitter as a way to promote information, such as blog posts or articles about the Constitution, capitalism, etc., and hope that this information might be passed along to others using Twitter.

    It is still young though, so who really knows how this service is going to adapt, but I thought your post was very interesting and made a lot of valid points.

    Comment by matt2n201 — December 29, 2008 @ 6:42 pm

  2. I definitely agree with you about using Twitter to share information. Good point!

    Comment by Elizabeth — December 29, 2008 @ 7:09 pm

  3. Here’s what you need to read to understand how twitter can be a tremendous tool. Just don’t use the web interface.

    http://vizedu.com/2008/12/how-to-use-twitter-as-a-twool/

    Download tweetdeck for one.

    Comment by Rick fisk — December 31, 2008 @ 11:11 am

  4. I’m also new to Twitter, but I think you’re underestimating the power of communication and marketing in advancing our movement. While I agree that Nothing will actually get Done on Twitter. It’s a great place to find out about Action Alerts from the Party or Groups working on an agenda. The reason all of this Worked for Obama is partially marketing, (as with any Good campaign) but also because his Voters felt ‘connected’ to the Process and ultimately to Him.
    Getting Conservatives involved, connected and aware is a Valuable asset that Twitter offers…

    Comment by Biased Girl — January 4, 2009 @ 7:51 am

  5. Biased Girl,

    I agree that Twitter can be a good tool for communicating; however, if someone is following hundreds or even thousands of people, how likely is it that he or she will see the action alerts? I think e-mail would work better for such notifications.

    Obviously, Obama won, but what evidence do we have that his presence on Twitter and the web in general and his voters’ connection to him helped? Was that the cause of his victory or effect of his popularity and support in the old (”mainstream”) media?

    Comment by Elizabeth — January 4, 2009 @ 8:40 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: